Copyright © Richard Perry 2018. Copyright commencement date is 14th February 2018.
Defendant Law Firms Page 5
Defendant Law Firm WAKE-Smith and solicitor MARK SERBY
Defendant Law Firm Begbies Traynor Group and solicitor Michael Locke
This law firm based in Yorkshire were initially representing BETAFENCE in the UK and had taken over from the Belgium law
firm KOB. I didn’t really have a lot of contact with them because Collyer Bristow LLP and FH Brundle were spear heading the
perjured cases and Wake Smith only attended the initial trial. However, what has peaked my interest in this firm is their
unlawful conversations with Hayley Bird at the Official Receiver who had claimed she had held talks with Betafence and Mark
Serby at Wake Smith. The Police need to speak to this law firm because they definitely have answers and i’m sure they can
shed light on other issues.
As Betafence hadn’t ever petitioned their costs, why was Mark Serby contacting the Official Receiver?
What was said in those conversations between Mark Serby and Hayley Bird?
Why didn’t Wake Smith ever issue any statutory demand for Betafence’s costs of around 15k at the time? If they thought the
firms were all ‘entirely independent entities’ why didn’t they continue representing Betafence and petition costs?
Why did they suddenly withdraw legal services from Betafence after the bankruptcy order was made in favour of FH Brundle?
Why did they suddenly hand over their client Betafence to Collyer Bristow LLP?
What did they know about the situation before they even decided to represent Betafence? They were obviously aware
Britannia Fasteners were involved in some way and so why did they try to keep that Defendant out of proceedings? Who
authored James Timlin’s Witness statement? Was it Betafence or Wake Smith? Who submitted this statement to the court?
There are many questions to be asked which I am putting together to ask them to help determine if I should bring criminal
charges against that firm but it looks like Mark Serby is definitely involved. I have emailed this firm and have asked them to
come forward to provide their alibi and evidence - they refuse to reply.
Wake Smith law Firm, their barrister who attended the initial trial in CC13P00980 and Mark Serby have profited from this
criminal activity and fraud.
Updated Jan 2020 events from 2019: IT IS NOW PROVEN IN EVIDENCE BY THE CONFESSION RECEIVED THAT WAKE
SMITH AND MARK SERBY WERE COMPLICIT IN THE CRIME OF BARRATRY, DECEIT AND ATTEMPTS TO CONCEAL
SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME. WE KNOW THIS BECAUSE OF THE CONFESSION FROM BEGBIES TRAYNOR
GROUP.
SEE PAGE: CONFESSIONS AND REVELATIONS - CLICK HERE.
What was said between the Official Receiver and Begbies Traynor for them to take over as trustee after the bankruptcy order
had been made against me?
Updated Jan 2020 events of 2019 - WE NOW KNOW THIS IS BECAUSE THE INDIVIDUALS AT THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER IN
BRISTOL WERE TRYING TO ABSOLVE THEMSELVES OF PARTICIPATING IN SERIOUS CRIME. THE CONFESSION FROM
BEGBIES TRYNOR GROUP HAS OPENED UP DOZENS OF QUESTIONS WHEREIN THE ONLY POSSIBLE TRUTHFUL
ANSWERS PROVE CRIME BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRODUCED. BEGBIES TRAYNOR GROUP SUBMIT PERJURED
FRAUDULENT APPLICATION TO MANCHESTER BANKRUPTCY COURT TO TRY TO CONCEAL A GBP 46,000 FRAUD OF
THE TAXPAYER IN FALSE CLAIMS OF EXPENSES ADMINSTERING THE BANKRUPTCY AGAINST ME. THIS HAS BEEN
SENT TO THE POLICE WHO DO NOTHING AT ALL.
There was definitely a legal contract or agreement because it isn’t possible that Begbies Traynor law group woke up one morning
to find they had become the trustee when I had been unknown to them. That is ludicrous and so what was the agreement
between the individuals at Bristol Official Receiver and BT law group? How much time and costs did BT law group spend/incur
administering my estate? I am willing to bet that they spent a hell of lot more time that they usually would on a penniless
individual’s estate when compared to any other case because they were conspiring with the Government Officials and doing
everything they could to try to permanently deprive me of my intellectual property rights.
They refused to take any aciton on my behalf whatsoever and tried to fob me off with nonsense that a fraud claim had already
been heard because of the false and fraudulent judgement made by McCahill in Bristol Court. It is proven in evidence that
judgement is unlawful. I pointed this out to Michael Locke the director of their Preston office and he said they refused to get
involved because they didn’t want to incur any costs! He also claimed that he could set up an insurance policy to assign me a
right of action and when I requested that he did so, he then made up other excuses and reason why he wouldn’t. The same
exact behaviour and actions of the Bristol Receiver staff.
This is fraud by abuse of position as a trustee, conspiracy, fraud, dishonest assistance, perjury act offences and so on. During a
meeting at Michael Locke’s Office and in his attempt to belittle my achievements and mock me, he asked me if I would throw
myself under a train to save my work. His reason was compared to his view that he would throw himself under a train to save his
children. I said I didn’t know and now having had the chance to think about it, my reply to Mr. Locke is: now that you have those
children, and you have had all the love, enjoyment, and privilege of having your children, and had the privilege of watching those
children grow and flourish (like I did with my lifetime’s work) how would you feel if you had been robbed of ever having them in
the first place? Would you throw yourself under a train and be hell bent on pursuing justice until the ends of the earth?
2019 Begbies Traynor Group provide what amounts to a written confession and the whole thing implodes on the
Defendants. They confess that after I had been made bankrupt and FH Brundle and Betafence thought they were in the clear,
FH Brundle attempted to buy the very patent they testified that they didn’t defraud, from Begbies Traynor Group. This is a written
confession that proves criminal intent and the fact that Betafence and FH Brundle (lead by little loser Michael Brundle) set out to
defraud me from the start and then when they got caught they spent hundreds of thousands of pounds in fraudulent court cases
claiming they didn’t have any interest in my patents, therefore proving a serious and organised criminal conspiracy that has led
to my losses outlined in my Victim Personal Statement. Begbies Traynor Group have defrauded the taxpayer. Found on 2019
Confessions and Revelations Page.
FURTHER PROOF THAT COLLYER BRISTOW LLP CLAIMED TO BE REPRESENTING ‘ALL THREE DEFENDANTS’ IN
GROUP 1 AFTER THEY THOUGHT THEYT HAD WON IN THE CIVIL CASES, THEREFORE PROVING CONSPIRACY AND
PERJURY ETC, IS FOUND IN ANOTHER OF THEIR OWN APPLICATION FORMS, WHICH IS ALSO FRAUDULENT AND
DESIGNED TO CONCEAL SERIOUS CRIME. This form was drafted by themselves and submitted by themselves to the court.
All three Defendants listed.
Drafted and submitted by Defendant Mr. Patrick Wheeler (see
the little ‘PW’ reference in the box) for Collyer Bristow LLp
“If you are a legal representative who do you represent?’
Answer : ‘Defendants’. Note they don’t say ‘we only represent
FH Brundle’ nor do they say ‘ we only represent two
Defendants’. They state ‘Defendants’ meaning all three as
supported by their other claims and own testimony to the court.
19 June 2015 - long after the civil case in 2013 and the
bankruptcy order they petitioned in 2014 when they testified
the three Defendants to all be ‘entirely separate entities’ (reply
to defence and counterclaim as shown on the previous pages,
drafted by Stuart Baran and Michael F Brundle) to avoid
conspiracy and fraud charges and the patents act offences.. In
the initial trial, the 2nd Defendant Betafence was represented
by Wake Smith and they kept the 3rd Defendant Britannia
Fasteners Ltd out of the proceedings. Proven in the letters
shown on the other pages that Collyer Bristow LLp claimed to
be representing FH Brundle as their only client, which is now
proven to be false and/or a criminal plan to avoid conspiracy,
evade liability under the patents act and evade fraud /
CRIMINAL charges.
This is a state of absolute lawlessness and Anarchy and this
has been aided and supported by judges in United Kingdom
courts.
That’s another count of perjury and fraud right there.
Upon hearing the claimant in person and
Stuart Baran for the Defendants.
I would like these people arrested and
disbarred immediately.
Collyer Bristow LLp is a law firm that is only successful because they are complicit in serious orgainsied crime and they can
only get clients by being willing to undermine the justice system and make a complete mockery of the entire Rule of Law.
These are not ‘Hollywood’ lawyers by any meaning of the term. This is a bunch of low life crooks who have managed to get
practice licences. They are eager and willing to issue and serve perjured proceedings in a United Kingdom Court of Law to
conceal serious crime so they can profit from it. This firm should be struck off immediately and a practice ban imposed
pending a criminal investigation.
If you have had a case where your opposing council is Collyer Bristow LLP and if the Judgement went against you, then
you should appeal the judgement immediately, because it will most likely be obtained through fraud and false witness
testimony - as proven here in my case. Hopefully this firm will be forced to close.
If they had ANY evidence whatsoever that would give them an alibi about their knowledge of the letters already discussed,
why not offer it freely to the court and say: ‘here’s the evidence, this is our alibi’. Surely as a lawyer you would in fact offer
this to the court to nip it in the bud right there and then and prevent any future ambush?
Update Dec 4th 2018
More proof of criminal attempts of concealment and perjury:
Revisting the letter from Collyer Bristow LLp to me of 22nd August 2016.
On page 1 of this letter it is written that at this point Collyer Bristow Llp now claim to be representing only two Defendants
named as FH Brundle and Betafence. This is important because in 2012 they claimed only to be representing FH Brundle when
they were trying to keep the three Defendants separate and filing witness testimony of ‘wholly independent entities’ and
‘definitely not working together’ etc to conceal the conspiracy. In 2015 and after the corrupted trial and bankruptcy order
obtained through serious crime they claimed to be representing ‘all three companies for convenience’ as proven by their own
letters and applications, further corroborated by Judge Richard Hacon. In 2016 and after it had come to light that there was
undeniable proof of conspiracy and everything else, Collyer Bristow LLp in corroboration with their big client Betafence decided
to suddenly drop the fact that they were representing the third Defendant Britannia Fasteners Ltd because from the evidence
provided by the Indian manufacturer, it was Britannia Fasteners that had been unlawfully using my name to order Betafence
product and this is indisputable evidence of fraud and passing off - carrying a punishment of upto 10 years in custody. Therefore
after Collyer Bristow LLp knew that I was pursuing these issues with the Police, they decided to try to further ring-fence and
absolve FH Brundle and Betafence by dropping their third client Britannia Fasteners before they applied for yet another perjured
restraining order against me in 2017 and where they requested it was heard by Richard Hacon. They thought that by dropping
the third party in the conspiracy and the one using my name, it would get the other big billion pound a year firms off the hook.
This is serious and organised crime and perjury, fraud, conspiracy, aiding and abetting, subornation, concealment, criminal
attempts and it undermines the entire Rule of Law. The proof of this is substantiated by their application for the 2nd restraining
order itself in 2017 IP2015000090 because Richard Hacon deliberately allowed this to go ahead whilst denying me all access to
any evidence and when he knew of the allegations I was making about this conspiracy of the three firms. He refused to ask a
single question about even this issue of the deliberate changing around of clients and then even drafted a judgement himself
corroborating the Collyer Bristow’s application and claims of only representing the two firms instead of the three firms they had
openly told Richard Hacon in court in the previous hearings. I had to reply to the application bundle and Collyer Bristow LLP
had stated in their application over 20 times (it may have even been 30 I can’t remember because I don’t have the bundle to
hand at time of writing) that they were representing the ‘First and Second Defendants’ (FH Brundle and Betafence) which was
corroborated and written by Richard Hacon in his own judgement. He even states ‘I did not ask and it did not matter’ in
relation to delving further into my allegations and obvious proof of criminal activity, which under any normal circumstances it
would be the job of the judge to get to the bottom of the matter and find the truth. This statement was made to cover his own
criminal judgement and absolve himself of criminal charges. This is called subornation to perjury, abuse of the adminstration of
justice, fraud by false representation, aiding abetting and corroboration, and conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office. It
is also participation in serious crime and concealment of evidence. It is also perverting justice. These are serious criminal
offences being carried out by a judge.
2019 Confessions received have now proven the entire crime from the beginning. Everything else is now
undeniable evidence and further proves the lengths these wretched little losers have gone to to try to
conceal their cruelty. See 2019 Confessions and Revelations Page CLICK HERE