Group 3 of the Defendants

Their offences against my Rafterclips® patents,

theft of the fencebrackets/fixing patent GB2401616,

and trademarks.

For Clarity there are at least three of my products, patents and trademarks defrauded by this Defendant. 1). the theft/fraud of patent GB2401616 2). the theft/fraud of my rafterclips patents (details to follow of the offending product when I return to the UK) 3). the theft/fraud of my rafterclips registered trademark During the course of trying to get my products to market I wrote to every large construction related product manufacturer, wholesaler, distributor and retailer I could find. As a little guy starting off, I expected to be met with professional corporate responsibility and not a mountain of deceit, hidden agendas and crime. Many of the large firms just didn’t reply, some replied and told me they weren’t interested and some eventually stocked my products. I met many businesses at the trade shows. I contacted the Defendants St. Gobain, and Jewsons and had conversations with their staff at the shows. I was given names, business cards, all the usual false promises and meaningless chit chat. I write to St.Gobain and Jewson between 2004 - 2010 asking them if they would stock my products or licence my patents - same as with Group 1. They claim they don’t have any interest. I have the correspondence because I didn’t throw it out like I did by mistake with the letter from 2010 Group 1 (‘we don’t sell wooden fencing only metal fencing’). Theft of Patent GB2401616 & Criminal Conspiracy to Avoid UK Patent Offences. I travel to Europe in 2012 to find that DIY Retailer ‘Ehitusa ABC’ are selling a product (below) that is without doubt stolen from my patent rights. I ask the retailer who is distributing it and I am told ‘Favor AS’. The Defendant St.Gobain owns Ehitusa ABC and has shares in Favor AS. I found the details on their own website with links to these firms. More photos to follow: Each side flange folds to form a U shaped channel so that each side flange has a tab cut from within. The holes in the tabs are the fixing points to fix the backplate to the underlying surface. This product is stolen from my patent GB2401616. Question: We have all of the same building methods and materials in the UK , so why isn’t this product sold in the UK ? If the answer is: A). We tried it in the UK and nobody bought it. = They would admit infringing my patent rights and committed fraud. B). We don’t think there is a market for this product in the UK. = How do you know if you haven’t tried it? There wasn’t a market for my Rafterclips® in the UK either until I invented the product and created the market. Isn’t it the truth that you know you have stolen my patent and in the UK that would be fraud under the Fraud Act 2006? C). Where is your own patent on this product? Please provide the numbers and I will have it revoked, but I don’t believe you were able to get one, or even have one because it would infringe my patent. This Defendant is a worldwide firm owning many smaller firms with shares and interests in the other Defendants’ firms. They are a trading partner of the Defendant in Group 3. It is inconceiveable that these firms are unaware of the offences or the crime they have carried out. Again - This is a criminal conspiracy and because it has been done with the UK firm’s involvement I am entitled to the turnover from the worldwide sales because without doubt this begun in the UK after I had written to the firms. I contact St. Gobain and ask for an explanation. They do not sell this product in the UK and yet we have all the same building methods and products and yet they sell this product all over Europe but not in the UK. They do not have any patent on this product. They write back and claim ‘we don’t sell wooden fencing’. Sounds familiar doesn’t it ! The firm removes all the links from its websites about these other firms selling the ripped off product and tries to delete all records that they have any interest in Favor AS. They re-do the Favor AS website to make it look like it is a separate firm. However they haven’t been clever enough because a simple search of the European trademarks register shows that at the time, Saint Gobain owned the trademark Favor AS. I printed a copy off for the records. i also took print off of their websites. I then get sued by Group 1 of the Defendants with their malicious and perjured prosecution and dont continue pursuing Group 3 as of yet. In 2017 I find that Saint Gobain have now launched another product that is for installing insulation between rafters. It is stolen from my rafterclips® patents. They have used my trademark Rafterclips® to launch and sell this product all over Europe and possibly further afield, which is a serious criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006 and Tradesmarks Act 1994. They distribute this product under my trademark through Amazon, Screwfix, Ebay and other online sites. I contact them again and say : “It seems to me that you think you’re going to come along and steal everything I create”. They reply stating that they claim the use of my trademark Rafterclips® is descriptive and they evade providing any defence to the fraud of my rafterclips® patents. To clarify: they launch a first product that infringes, and is stolen from, my patent GB2401616 and claim ‘we don’t sell wooden fencing. Then they launch a second product stolen from my rafterclips patents and call it Rafterclips which is my registered trademark, and sell millions of this product, thus wiping out all my investment and years of pioneering this work without paying me a penny and after claiming they dont have any interest in me or my products. Then in writing they admit doing it and try to argue their way out of it thinking they will argue a civil liability. Now they have stolen two products and my trademarks and continue to defraud me of millions of pounds of revenues that they take offshore and which belong to me and the people of the United Kingdom. This could be construed as cheating Public Revenues. There is some evidence that this Group 3 is trading with Group 4 and because they’re using the same excuse of ‘we don’t sell wooden fencing’ I wouldn’t be surprised if they are also linked through business to Groups 1 and 2.